Conservatism vs Wokeism: A Clash of Worldviews

The modern political landscape is increasingly defined by two opposing worldviews: Conservatism and Wokeism (aka Social Justice). These two ideologies shape public discourse, influence policy, and drive social movements across the globe. While conservatism upholds tradition, community values, and cultural heritage, Wokeism—often linked to modern social justice movements—seeks radical transformation of societal norms. Understanding these two forces is crucial to grasping the political and cultural shifts of our time. Conservatism vs Wokeism

The Core of Conservatism

Conservatism is historically rooted in the political right, dating back to the French Revolution. Originally, conservatives were monarchists who sought to preserve traditional institutions, the church, and the social order. Over time, conservatism evolved, but its core remains: a commitment to preserving cultural identity, national heritage, and the well-being of families and communities.

One prominent branch of conservatism today is the MAGA movement, which champions individual liberty, free speech, and entrepreneurial spirit while rejecting control by both big government and corporate monopolies. It promotes self-reliance within a society deeply connected to historical values and traditions.

At its heart, conservatism represents ordinary people who wish to maintain the cultural fabric of their nation. It opposes radical overhauls of social norms and rejects identity politics that divide rather than unite. Conservatives believe in republican democracy, but within a structure that respects tradition and societal cohesion.

The Origins and Rise of Wokeism

On the opposite end of the spectrum lies Wokeism, the modern manifestation of far-left ideology. Historically, left-wing revolutions were led by figures such as Robespierre, Saint-Just, and Marat, who sought to dismantle existing structures in the name of radical equality. These revolutionaries often turned on their own, demonstrating the destructive nature of unchecked ideological zeal.

Today, Wokeism is driven by social justice activism that has embedded itself into educational institutions, corporate policies, and government frameworks. Initially perceived as a movement of harmless idealists, Wokeism has proven to be deeply invasive, reshaping cultural narratives and influencing policy on a massive scale.

The Conservative Rejection of Wokeism

Conservatives see Wokeism as an existential threat to traditional values and societal stability. Like historical counter-revolutionaries—such as Chiang Kai-shek resisting Mao’s Cultural Revolution—conservatives oppose radical social engineering that disrupts long-standing norms.

Key areas of contention include:

• The Breakdown of Family and Social Structures: The rise of Woke policies coincides with increasing mental health issues, particularly among young people, as traditional support networks dissolve.
• The Rejection of Biological Reality: Wokeism challenges fundamental gender roles, suggesting that being a man or a woman is merely a social construct. This ideology extends into issues like biological men competing in women’s sports, creating widespread controversy.
• The Rise of Identity Politics: Woke ideology prioritises race, sex, and religion over merit and societal harmony, leading to divisions rather than unity.
• Declining Fertility Rates: As traditional family values erode, birth rates in many Western nations have plummeted, raising concerns about societal sustainability.

How Wokeism Gained Power

A significant turning point in the rise of Wokeism came in 2010, when corporate and financial elites began promoting social engineering through stakeholder capitalism. Unlike traditional free-market capitalism, which focuses on economic growth, stakeholder capitalism prioritises ideological goals such as diversity quotas, climate activism, and social justice policies.

This shift saw businesses and governments push Woke ideology on a global scale, though it faced resistance in non-liberal societies like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia, where traditional power structures remain dominant.

The Bigger Picture: Culture Over Economy

While economic issues matter, conservatives argue that the real battle is over culture, tradition, and social cohesion. A strong economy means little if the foundations of society—family, national identity, and moral order—are undermined. Conservatives do not oppose social progress but believe it should be balanced with respect for historical values and natural human structures.

The Path Forward

The conflict between Conservatism and Wokeism is not just a policy debate—it is a fundamental struggle over the future of society. Conservatives believe that maintaining a stable and culturally rich nation requires resisting ideological extremism and reaffirming traditional values. The choice is clear: either uphold the principles that have guided civilizations for centuries, or embrace radical changes with unpredictable consequences.

In this ideological battle, conservatives remain steadfast in their commitment to preserving what matters most: faith, family, freedom, and the enduring values that define a thriving society.